As everyone knows, The LA Times has a damning tape of Barack Obama honoring a Palestinian terrorist frontman at the guy's going away banquet (don't worry, lefties, he didn't go that far away), and while the paper reported on it in April, it did not release the tape.
And it won't release the tape.
The Times claims that it has a deal with the source not to reveal it. That's a lie, and I don't say that in the same way liberals say, for example, that Bush lied. The Times is actually lying. Who turns over a tape with the condition that the media not publish it? And in any case, why didn't the Times say they had such an agreement prior to the last day or so?
But of course, we want to give liars the benefit of the doubt, so keep the tape, just give us the transcript. Granted, the transcript is a poor substitute for seeing Obama actually pal around with terrorists, but it will likely be enough, and most important, the Times has no excuse not to do it.