Let me make this clear from the start – I am not anti-faggot.
If it's good enough for Ann, it's plenty good enough for me. In fact, I will back any word Ann chooses to use.
Conservatives as a group may be wimpy scum, but liberals are off-the-charts filthy, and it doesn't matter that they are also unimaginably stupid and/or outright insane. They will ruin your life, this country, and quite possibly get us killed if they and their policies prevail.
But they aren't the reason I decided to back Ann unequivocally. I'm not even backing Ann just because she makes them crazy. Make that "crazier."
And even though she's Public Enemy #3 behind Bush and Cheney, even that's not why I back her, because I don't back PEs 1 and 2.
No, I back Ann because of the reaction of people who presume to speak for conservatives – the O'Reillys and the Average Jo'Reillys of the world.
You're probably acutely aware that there are actually very few real conservative voices, and those people are regarded by liberals in the same way Palestinians regard the Israelis – and they receive the same treatment – politically speaking, of course.
Although we have seen teasers of what might really happen if a conservative were to find himself alone in a crowd of liberals..
But there are also people who want you to believe they are rational, objective, non-partisan, independent, and above all, civilized (not to be confused with intelligent, mature, and especially, refined), and they want to let you know that Ann is bad, and that you should reject her.
While all well-known conservatives are constantly under attack, liberals had a good year in 2006, and they were disappointed because they thought it was going to be a great one – Not only did they win Congress, but Limbaugh was being investigated for illegal Viagra, DeLay for a different non-illegality, and of course there was the even less illegal Libby, but they also thought they might have Ann for plagiarism.
There was even extreme – or should I say, more extreme – bit of nonsense about her voting.
Nothing came of the plagiarism garbage, but one conservative forum guy, one of them pseudo-conservatives, actually had the nerve to claim that the plagiarism charge was valid. By the way, you know what a pseudo-conservative is, he's the guy who takes global warming seriously while claiming liberals are just taking it too far.
That's when the pool of people I thought were conservatives began to shrink, and by the end of last year, it had shrunk to a puddle, again, no doubt due to global warming.
Then two weeks ago, O'Reilly said something seemingly off the cuff that nevertheless infuriated me more than anything else he's ever said, and that's saying something. In answer to a viewer email which claimed he did not criticize the far right the way he does the wacko left, he said something so foul that he'd never let a guest get away with anything remotely similar – he equated Ann Coulter with David Duke.
He looked into the camera and told the viewer that her charge was untrue: "I criticized Ann Coulter for what she said about the Jersey Girls, and I have criticized David Duke many times."
That's right, the conservative equivalent of the criminally insane liberal left is, Ann Coulter and David Duke – together again.
Then today, the once beloved, never trusted Bernie Goldberg said that he felt conservatives were just "growing tired" of Ann. He said that she really didn't speak for anyone, and added something to the effect that she's just a a buffoon, though he didn't use that word.
The bottom line is, it's not just liberals who want real conservatives, the real Great Americans, brought down, and not only will I not be a part of it no matter how much I disagree with Ann and others, and I do intensely at times, I might just stick now even if they do something illegal.and immoral. You know, not like attacking liberals and forcing them to convert to Christianity, something really bad.